• Support the Moscow Mechanics
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
      • Volunteer & Internship Opportunities
    • Our Vision
    • The HIS Board
    • Community Educational Partners
    • Corporate & Foundation Support
  • STEM Resources
    • Your State/Province
      • United States
    • Resource Reviews
    • Elementary
      • Elementary Science
      • Elementary Technology
      • Elementary Engineering
      • Elementary Math
    • Secondary
      • Secondary Science
      • Secondary Technology
      • Secondary Engineering
      • Secondary Math
    • 4-H STEM/Science Curriculum
    • Conference Excerpts
  • FIRST Robotics

Homeschool Institute of Science

Just another WordPress site

October 16, 2014

Can Creationists actually do good science?

60px-CarbeneWell, duh, of course. Unless you ask Bill Nye.

I like the way Philip Skell puts it. Skell is the father of carbene chemistry (CH2).

“Certainly, my own research with antibiotics during World War II received no guidance from insights provided by Darwinian evolution. Nor did Alexander Fleming’s discovery of bacterial inhibition by penicillin. I recently asked more than 70 eminent researchers if they would have done their work differently if they had thought Darwin’s theory was wrong. The responses were all the same: No. … I found that Darwin’s theory had provided no discernible guidance, but was brought in, after the breakthroughs, as an interesting narrative gloss.

… The efforts mentioned there are not experimental biology; they are attempts to explain already authenticated phenomena in Darwinian terms, things like human nature. Further, Darwinian explanations for such things are often too supple: Natural selection makes humans self-centered and aggressive—except when it makes them altruistic and peaceable. Or natural selection produces virile men who eagerly spread their seed—except when it prefers men who are faithful protectors and providers. When an explanation is so supple that it can explain any behavior, it is difficult to test it experimentally, much less use it as a catalyst for scientific discovery.

Darwinian evolution—whatever its other virtues—does not provide a fruitful heuristic in experimental biology.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Article by William Boyd / Uncategorized

This Morning in Creation

Recent Posts

  • The Codfather and Adopting Floating Marine Objects
  • The Benefits and Need for Categories
  • Putting Life Into Categories
  • Current Projects
  • Blessing of the Dolphins

PO Box 8605
Moscow, ID 83843
(208) 301-4737

The Homeschool Institute of Science, Inc. is a registered 501 (c)(3) non-profit organization. All donations are tax deductible.

Copyright © 2025 · Homeschool Institute of Science on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.